Dermal Fillers
Facecare
4 min. read
  |  
June 6, 2024

Living the Dream - The Barbie Transformation by Dr Evgenyia Shelemba

Written by
Dr. Evgeniya Shelemba
Dr. Evgeniya Shelemba

The popular "Barbie" doll has evolved into a cultural icon, with a significant impact on modern aesthetics. Her symmetrical facial features, smooth and radiant skin, sculpted contours, and youthful appearance, have come to represent a specific aesthetic ideal. The accessibility of cosmetic procedures, social media's influence, and underlying body image concerns influence many to seek the "perfect" features.

Living the Dream - The Barbie Transformation by Dr Evgenyia Shelemba

Introduction

Interestingly, the Aesthetic Society has reported a significant 23% increase in cosmetic procedures in 2022, with women making up 95% of those seeking these treatments (surgical and non-surgical).

With this module, healthcare professionals can better understand the nuances of the "Barbie" aesthetic and its principles. It will help doctors address patient worries and focus on safety and natural results for achievable aesthetic results.

What is the 'Barbie' Look All About?

When discussing the aesthetic principles of the "Barbie" look, we explore the characteristics and features typically associated with the appearance inspired by the famous Barbie doll. This beauty trend focuses on features such as

Symmetry:

Symmetry refers to the balanced proportions of facial features. Different cultures value symmetry for its connection to attractiveness and beauty. 

Flawless skin:

Achieving clear, radiant, and flawless skin involves addressing concerns such as acne, hyperpigmentation, and uneven texture. 

Sculpted features:

Emphasis on sculpted facial features such as high cheekbones, a defined jawline, and a sleek neck. 

Youthful appearance:

A healthy balance of collagen and elastin is essential to maintaining a youthful appearance, Facial fullness is defined through well-defined cheeks and lips, supported by fat pads, while a strong jawline and prominent cheekbones complement the look.

Pretreatment Considerations

A responsible approach requires a comprehensive patient assessment beyond simply addressing the desired aesthetic outcome. This includes evaluating medical history, psychological well-being,1,2 and underlying motivations to ensure the patient makes informed decisions. Using a mirror can be a useful tool to identify specific concerns in facial zones. A picture that reflects the patient's facial structure can aid communication and planning for enhancements. The clinician can use pre-treatment photographs and different schemas to analyze facial aesthetics and proportions.

It's important to be mindful of the potential for body dysmorphia (BDD), a mental health condition characterized by a persistent preoccupation with perceived flaws in one's appearance. BDD patients seeking cosmetic procedures may be at higher risk, requiring thorough psychological evaluation and potential referral to mental health professionals.

Steps3 to Ensure Safe and Effective Application Treatment

  • Shift Focus: Explain the move from wrinkle-chasing to a 3D approach with volume restoration.
  • Educate on Benefits: Explain how volume restoration (e.g., in cheeks) reduces folds (e.g., nasolabial fold).
  • Address Concerns: Correct the misconception that wrinkle removal is enough.
  • Counteract Media Hype: Reassure patients that "volume restoration" won't create a "fat" face.
  • Visual Aids: Use a patient's younger photo to show volume loss and its correction.
  • Before & After Photos: Show examples of volume restoration effects (remember individual results vary).
  • Multi-session Treatment: Explain achieving optimal results may require multiple sessions.
  • Staff Training: Train staff to advocate for volume restoration and contouring.
  • Synergistic Approach: Highlight the benefits of combining fillers, neuromodulators, and non-invasive technology.
  • Minimize Risks: Implement diligent skin prepping for injections, especially with long-lasting products.

Any pretreatment discussion is incomplete without a detailed assessment of the face and the neck. The following table highlights the key aspects4 involved:

Aspect Description
Facial Proportions Divided into horizontal thirds:
Upper (Trichion to Glabella),
Middle (Glabella to Subnasale),
Lower (Subnasale to Menton)
Divided into vertical fifths:
First Fifth (Helix to Lateral Canthus),
Second Fifth (Lateral Canthus to Medial Canthus),
Intercanthal Distance
Forehead Constitutes upper third of the face
Boundaries:
Trichion to Glabella
Ideal Nasofrontal Angle: 115°–135°
Eyebrows Ideal Position:
Medial aspect should not extend past a vertical line from lateral nasal ala
Gender Differences:
Male eyebrows at superior orbital rim level, gentle curve;
Female eyebrows 1 cm above rim, steeper curve with apex at lateral limbus
Eyes Divided into three regions:
medial canthus to medial limbus,
medial limbus to lateral limbus,
lateral limbus to lateral canthus.
Intercanthal Distance: Average 30 mm
Nose Positioned in middle third of face.
Key Landmarks: Radix, dorsum (bridge), nasal tip.
Aesthetic Lines: Nasofrontal, nasolabial, nasofacial, nasomental angles.
Ideal Width: Base of alar margins equidistant to intercanthal distance.
Lips Located within lower one-third of the face.
Ideal Width: Vertical line from medial limbus to lateral edge of oral commissures.
Lip Projection:
Upper lip 3.5 mm anterior to subnasale-pogonion line;
lower lip 2.2 mm anterior;
lower lip height twice upper lip.
Chin Demarcated by labiomental sulcus superiorly, menton inferiorly
Chin Projection:
Evaluated by glabella-subnasale to subnasale-pogonion angle (ideal 11°).
Neck Cervicomental Angle: Ideal 85°–95°
Aging Effects:
Loss of definition, obtuse angle.
Ears Alignment: Superior aspect with eyebrow, inferior aspect with nasal ala.
Dimensions: Width (50–60% of length), length (similar to nose length)
Inclination: Long axis posteriorly inclined 15–30°, parallel to nasal dorsum.
Hinderer's Lines Drawn from the ala to the tragus and from the oral commissure to the lateral canthus.
Three-Zone Analysis Evaluation should be regional, noting areas reflecting or shadowing light.
Areas of shadow or defect are targets for volume-enhancing injections, while tissue weaknesses are targets for strengthening injections.
Photographic Documentation Clear communication with patients and accurate record-keeping is essential.

Non-Surgical Treatments for a Defined Jawline & a Smooth Neckline

The jawline, chin, and neck5,6,7,13 are areas particularly prone to visible changes with aging:

1. Loss of Jawline Definition:

  • Progressive skin laxity, depletion of facial fat deposits, and resorption of alveolar bone contribute to a relative excess of skin in the lower face. This results in a loss of definition of the jawline. Weakening of the mandibular septum contributes to the sagging of jowl fat compartments. Contraction of the platysma muscle also affects jawline definition with its downward pull.
  • Mandible recession and bone resorption lead to a loss of mandibular volume and the formation of anterior mandibular grooves.

2. Facial Jowls: This is a result of the loss of masseteric ligament support, allowing facial fat to descend to the mandibular border.

3. Mandibular Border Retreat: The retreat of the mandibular border allows exposure of submental contents, contributing to the merging of the angle of the mandible into the neck.

4. Chin Concerns: Loss of lateral and inferior volume in the chin results in relative protrusion of the central chin and ptosis of the lateral chin to create the impression of chin widening. Women tend to have decreased chin projection, while men may experience increased projection. Recession of the mandible on either side of the mentum contributes to the formation of pre-jowl sulci and chin ptosis.

5. Perioral Region: The lip area loses definition and volume as the vermilion border and Cupid's bow diminish. Perioral wrinkles deepen due to changes in the orbicularis oris muscle.

6. Neck Issues:

  • Turkey Neck Deformity: Along with jowls, loss of skin support and the downward pull of the platysma muscle over time contribute to developing a "turkey neck" appearance.
  • Vertical Fibrous Bands: Contraction of the platysma8 muscle forms vertical fibrous bands on the neck, while skin laxity contributes to the development of horizontal rhytides.
  • Changes in Cervicomental Angle: As aging progresses, the descent of the hyoid bone and larynx leads to a loss or blunting (increase) of the cervicomental angle.

How Different Therapies Can Address These Issues:

  • Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT) Injection Therapy: BoNT injections can target hyperactive platysma muscle fibers, reduce the appearance of platysmal bands and provide a minimally-invasive neck and jawline lift. These injections can also improve posture by relaxing the trapezius muscle and allowing for a more open upper body position.
  • Cryolipolysis: Also known as fat freezing or CoolSculpting, this innovative technique utilizes controlled cooling to target unwanted fat deposits resistant to diet and exercise. Studies have shown an average reduction of 15-28% in treated areas. The damaged fat cells are gradually eliminated by the body's natural processes.
  • Dermal Fillers: Injectable dermal fillers can add volume to the sagging jawline and chin area, restoring definition and creating a lifted look.
  • Ultherapy: Ultherapy leverages ultrasound technology to stimulate collagen production, leading to tighter skin. It targets deeper layers and underlying tissues, resulting in a lifted jawline and firmer neck.
  • Kybella: Kybella functions through injecting deoxycholic acid into the submental area to specifically target and eliminate fat cells, leading them to break down and naturally exit the body. Over time, this diminishes submental fat to create a sleeker jawline and chin without surgical intervention. Several treatment sessions may be necessary for the best outcome.
  • Thread Lift12: Through thread lifting, cells receive a continuous mechanical stimulus known as Mechanotransduction, which triggers the production of new collagen and boosts cell metabolism. This process impacts cell activity and tightens the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Thread lift utilizes absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in the dermis and subcutaneously to lift lax skin. According to a study, thread lifting has proven safe and effective in mild to modest face sagging, fine wrinkles, and marked facial pores.
  • Laser Treatments: Laser treatments can enhance the appearance of the jawline and neck by stimulating collagen production, improving skin texture, and promoting skin tightening. Fractional laser resurfacing and non-ablative laser treatments are commonly used for this purpose.
  • Microcurrent Therapy: Uses low-level electrical currents to stimulate facial muscles to improve muscle tone and firmness. It mimics the body's electrical pulses to increase ATP production, encourage collagen and elastin production, and move lymph to reduce signs of aging.
  • Topical Treatments: Some topical treatments, including creams containing retinoids or peptides, may help improve skin firmness and elasticity over time. While not as dramatic as other options, they can complement other non-surgical treatments.

Energy Devices7,14 for Skin Tightening and Radiance

Technique Primary Indication(s) Mechanism of Action Advantages Disadvantages Example
Ablative lasers Moderate to deep rhytids and scars Destruction of the chromophore water (present in the epidermis and dermis) Effective at treating deep rhytids and scars. Significant downtime; High risk of dyspigmentation, especially in darker skin types. CO2 laser
Non-ablative lasers Mild to moderate rhytids and scars Selective destruction of chromophores in the dermis Minimal downtime; Homogenizes color and texture of skin. Not shown to be very effective in skin tightening 1550-nm Erbium-doped fiber laser
Radiofrequency Skin tightening Heating of tissue with electrothermal energy in the form of an oscillating current. Minimal downtime; Well tolerated; Shown to be effective for skin tightening of face and neck. Mild discomfort during the procedure. Thermage
Microfocused ultrasound Skin tightening; Destruction of solid tumors. Heating of tissue with a concentrated beam of ultrasound waves. Shown to be effective for skin tightening of the face and neck; Different probes can target different skin depths. Mild to moderate discomfort during the procedure; May have pain and bruising afterward. Ulthera
Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Skin rejuvenation, pigmentation, vascular lesions Selective photothermolysis targeting melanin and hemoglobin in the skin. Effective for a variety of skin concerns; Minimal downtime May not be suitable for all skin types; Risk of adverse effects such as burns and hyperpigmentation Palomar StarLux
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) Collagen production, angiogenesis Modulation of calcium-binding kinetics leading to nitric oxide cascades Increased collagen production, stimulation of angiogenesis Limited evidence in cosmetic medicine; Potential for conflicting results -

Facial Sculpting with HA Dermal Fillers and Biostimulators

Hyaluronic Acid (HA)9,12

Hyaluronic acid is the choice of dermal filler for its exceptional water-holding capability; It is a staple ingredient in many cosmetic formulations. Recent advancements like high-viscosity, low molecular weight HA (LMWHA) have further improved cosmetic results. LMWHA's unique composition offers high cohesivity and viscosity, making it ideal for volumizing and contouring facial features. 

Mechanism of Action:

By attracting and retaining water, HA enhances skin hydration, restores volume, and maintains elasticity. In addition, it offers structural support to the skin. HA stimulates collagen production, improving skin texture and firmness over time. Their soft, gel-like consistency can be customized to mimic natural skin texture for subtle enhancement or provide more structure for deeper support. This adaptability comes from the availability of HA fillers in different viscosities, allowing them to effectively address both volume loss and structural deficiencies at various tissue depths.

Additionally, HA fillers are categorized by viscosity, with higher "G-prime" (G') products recommended for building structure through periosteal injections. It is preferred for cost-effective non-surgical procedures due to its long-lasting results, superior lifting capacity, and smooth injection for patient comfort.

Benefits

Mid-Face: Periorbital Region: Nose: Lower-Face and Lips: Upper-Face:
Provides a lifting effect.
Improves deficiencies and hollow appearance.
Enhances malar projection.
Reshapes the nose.
Addresses volume loss and skin sagging.
Softens tear trough and nasolabial crease.
Corrects prejowl sulcus.
Restores volume in the submalar region.
Improves overall appearance and periorbital area.
Helps in the treatment of neighboring areas during cheek injections.
Corrects tear trough deformity.
Rejuvenates soft tissue and bone resorption.
Addresses volume depletion.
Improves skin quality, hydration, and smoothness.
Corrects infraorbital rim depression.
Enhances upper lid and supraorbital brow fullness.
Smoothens lateral canthal region.
Corrects orbital oculi muscle contraction.
Reduces the risk of the Tyndall effect.
Offers an alternative to rhinoplasty.
Corrects asymmetry and aging-related changes.
Maintains nasal shape and projection.
Fills concavity and hump.
Improves nasofrontal angle.
Corrects columellar retraction.
Enhances nasal dorsum and tip.
Provides sustained projection.
Offers minimal invasiveness and a shorter recovery time.
Restores facial volume and contour.
Defines chin and jawline.
Improves chin projection.
Corrects marionette lines and prejowl sulcus.
Enhances lips' size, shape, and projection.
Improves skin quality and elasticity.
Creates a pleasing, natural appearance.
Corrects perioral wrinkles.
Balances tissue resistance and muscle domination.
Volumizes temples to avoid facial disproportions.
Contours forehead and glabella.
Shapes, augments, and elevates eyebrows.
Addresses asymmetry.
Improves position and shape of eyebrows.
Corrects static lines and wrinkles.
Optimizes volume and tissue support.
Restores youthful appearance and attractiveness.
Enhances overall facial harmony.

Biostimulators

Biostimulators, such as Poly-L-lactic Acid (PLLA), Polycaprolactone (PCL) , Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and Calcium Hydroxyapatite (CaHA), are injectable treatments that combat visible signs of aging. They achieve this by stimulating the body's natural collagen production and promoting tissue renewal.

Properties and Mechanism of Action10,12

Skin thinning and loss of elasticity often result from internal factors (chronological aging) and external factors (sun exposure).The effectiveness of biostimulators depends on their concentration, volume, individual characteristics, and injection technique.

Property/Material Poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) Polycaprolactone (PCL) Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA) Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)
Mechanism of Action Stimulates fibroblasts and collagen production, gradual volumization. Provides scaffold for collagen deposition. Stimulates fibroblasts and collagen production, immediate filling followed by long-term neocollagenesis. Permanent effect, non-resorbable, stimulates fibroblasts and collagen production.
Duration of Results Up to 2 years, sustained volumetric expansion. Up to 4 years, gradual and long-lasting effect. Up to 2 years. Permanent, lasting effect up to 5 years.

Benefits

  • Reduces fine lines, wrinkles, and sagging skin.
  • Tightens and rejuvenates the skin.
  • Enhances skin texture and appearance.
  • Diminishes age-related blemishes and restores lost volume.

Navigating the Right Choices11

While it is important to meet patient requests, promoting treatments for an unattainable look can potentially harm patient health.

The "Barbie" look can create idealistic expectations and dissatisfaction with one's appearance. This could fuel patients seeking more cosmetic procedures that may harm physical and mental well-being. Chasing an unrealistic aesthetic can have risks, such as complications from surgery or unhealthy practices like extreme dieting or excessive exercise.

Here is how healthcare professionals can mitigate the ethical concerns associated with the same:

  • Promote diverse beauty standards by educating about aesthetic procedure limitations, emphasizing self-acceptance, and encouraging unique beauty.
  • Prioritize patient well-being, refuse unsafe or unrealistic procedures, and provide alternative solutions or guidance when necessary.
  • Staying informed about potential complications linked to specific procedures, products, and techniques.
  • Use approved products and equipment as intended when performing aesthetic procedures by following established guidelines and protocols.

Conclusion

The "Barbie" aesthetic adds a complex dimension to aesthetics. While its defined features and proportions often spark desires in some, it's essential to acknowledge the significant gap between this idealized image and biological reality. 

There is a debate about whether women are compelled by societal pressures to conform to unrealistic beauty standards, which may affect their choices. This raises concerns about informed consent and how external factors influence patient decisions. On the other hand, some argue that women possess agency and autonomy and that their choices are based on personal desires, not just external pressures. This highlights the need to understand individual desires, respect patient autonomy, and ensure informed decision-making.

Healthcare professionals must understand the cultural context and potential health concerns associated with this specific aesthetic to navigate the complex landscape effectively. Open and honest communication, thorough patient assessments, and a focus on holistic well-being are key. Patient consultations for achieving a Barbie-like appearance should prioritize realistic and healthy outcomes while understanding patient motivations.

Looking ahead, it is important to remain informed about advancements in aesthetic medicine while ensuring they enable individuals to express their unique beauty. 

References:

  1. Veer, V & Jackson, L & Kara, Naveed & Hawthorne, M. (2014). Pre-operative considerations in aesthetic facial surgery. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 128. 1-7. 10.1017/S0022215113003162. 
  2. Mohd Zaman, U. M. S. (2021). Non-Surgical Medical Aesthetic Treatment Algorithm for General Practitioners in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Pacific Aesthetic Sciences, 1(1). Retrieved from www.japa-edu.org
  3. Fitzgerald, R., Graivier, M. H., Kane, M., Lorenc, Z. P., Vleggaar, D., Werschler, W. P., & Kenkel, J. M. (2010). Facial Aesthetic Analysis. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 30(1_Supplement), 25S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X10373360 -https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/30/1_Supplement/25S/191164?login=false - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/CCID.S30794 
  4. Tadros, A., Banki, M., & Ferneini, E. M. (2019). Facial Assessment. In Office-Based Maxillofacial Surgical Procedures. ISBN: 978-3-030-22370-0.
  5. Swift, A., Liew, S., Weinkle, S., Garcia, J. K., & Silberberg, M. B. (2021). The Facial Aging Process From the “Inside Out”. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 41(10), 1107-1119. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa339
  6. Chiu, Annie & Bertucci, Vince & Coimbra, Daniel & Li, Dan. (2023). Assessment and Treatment Strategies for the Aesthetic Improvement of the Lower Face and Neck. Clinical, Cosmetic, and Investigational Dermatology. Volume 16. 1521-1532. 10.2147/CCID.S405639. 
  7. Am, Mokhallalati & Sa, Lahham & Al-Niaimi, Firas & Badran, Saif. (2019). Non-Surgical Neck Contouring. 
  8. Yi, H., Lee, H., Lee, K., Hu, W., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2022). Anatomical Proposal for Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection Targeting the Platysma Muscle for Treating Platysmal Band and Jawline Lifting: A Review. Toxins, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120868 
  9. Lipko-Godlewska, S., Bolanča, Ž., Kalinová, L., Kermen, I., Onisak, B., Papp, I., Rebrov, M., & Valančienė, G. (2021). Whole-Face Approach with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 14, 169-178. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S292501 
  10. Guo, J., Fang, W., & Wang, F. (2023). Injectable fillers: Current status, physicochemical properties, function mechanism, and perspectives. RSC Advances, 13(34), 23841-23858. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra04321e
  11. De Beaufort, I., Bolt, I., & Vandamme, S. (2011). Appearance, Ethics of. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00321-5 
  12. Li, Kelun & Meng, Fanyu & Li, Yu & Tian, Yueyi & Chen, Hao & Jia, Qi & Cai, Hongxin & Jiang, Heng. (2022). Application of Nonsurgical Modalities in Improving Facial Aging. International Journal of Dentistry. 2022. 1-18. 10.1155/2022/8332631. 
  13. Coleman, S. R., & Grover, R. (2005). The Anatomy of the Aging Face: Volume Loss and Changes in 3-Dimensional Topography. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 26(1_Supplement), S4-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012 - https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/26/1_Supplement/S4/223473?login=false 
  14. O’Connor, Kelly & Kandula, Prasanthi & Kaminer, Michael. (2021). Non-surgical skin tightening. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 8. 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.60.
Dr. Evgeniya Shelemba
Dr. Evgeniya Shelemba
Dermatologist